|

talking about
...
A number of files on this
web site are in PDF format.
You will need Adobe Reader
to be able to read these documents. Click below should you need to access this
software.

| |
By Chris Chittenden
“I keep six honest serving-men
(They taught me all I knew); Their names are What and Why and When And How and
Where and Who.”
… Rudyard Kipling (1865 - 1936), “The Elephant's Child” (1902)
What word do you begin most of your questions with? If you are like most people,
you will ask “why” questions more often. Even though this may seem innocuous
enough at first glance, there are often some interesting by-products when a
“why” question is asked.
The first thing to consider is how “why” questions fit into effective
conversations. As coaches, we have learnt that an effective conversation is one
takes the participants to an outcome they desire. You may recall from previous
articles, that we can identify three types of conversation – descriptive,
speculative and action. A “descriptive conversation” helps those involved
develop a shared understanding about something that is relevant to them; a
“speculative conversation” is all about creating new possibilities and finally
an “action conversation” relates to the coordination of action with others.
“Why” questions are largely the domain of “descriptive conversations” and asking
them holds people in explaining the reasons behind how things are. Although
valuable in developing a shared understanding, “descriptive conversations” focus
on the past and have people look backwards. Hence, if you want to move towards
new actions, too many “why” questions may not be beneficial as they hold people
in the past.
Next, when asked a “why” question about their actions, many people feel the need
to justify themselves. This is exacerbated if, as is generally the case, there
is no context put with the “why” question. A lack of context allows for a broad
interpretation of the question and if a person has a concern about their role in
a situation then justification will most likely follow. This has the potential
to set up an underlying emotional space that is defensive. If you are seeking to
have a conversation where new actions are taken, then such a mood is not
conducive to that. Rather such situations allow for the possibility of blaming
others or obviating responsibility and these aspects have to then be dealt with
before progress can be made.
As coaches, we seek to have conversations to generate new actions and so we do
not ask many “why” questions. If we want to explore the story behind a
situation, we will most likely ask “what” questions with a context. For example,
rather than “Why did you do that?”; we might start by developing context and ask
“What was important for you in doing that?”. We can then use their response to
get a sense of what they hoped to achieve and move the conversation forward from
there.
Furthermore, we have often worked with managers who get asked lots of “why”
questions and fall in to the trap of justifying themselves and the ineffective
moods that go with that. These people often resort to clichés or a parroted
company line as their response and this can have a negative impact on their
authority with those people who report to them. A useful strategy in these
situations is to learn to reframe “why” questions in to “what” or “how”
questions that have a forward focus and then answer those questions.
There is much more to developing an effective conversational style, however one
place to start is to listen to how often you use or answer “why” questions and
observe the responses you get or give. This awareness may be the start of an
improvement in your communication style.
Copyright © 2005 Chris
Chittenden
| |
|